Mileage Based User Fees: The future is now! – or at least by 2050
Recorded Presentations from the meeting are now available.
A folder icon represents that recordings are available for at least one presentation in the session.
Purchasing Recording Access:
ITS America is now offering the option to purchase whole meeting or track access to the recordings if you were not a full registered attendee of the meeting. You may Purchase Full Meeting Access
or you will have the option to purchase just individual track access. If you want to purchase multiple tracks, you will need to browse to a recording in each track to purchase that individual track. Full registered meeting attendees still have free access using their registration credentials. Please email firstname.lastname@example.org
if you need your registration credentials sent to you.
Session Number Key:
AM=Annual Meeting Sessions
SS=Special Interest Sessions
TS=Technical and Scientific Sessions
Monday, May 21, 2012: 2:00 PM-3:30 PM
Chesapeake 5 (Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center)
Jack Basso, Director of Program Finance and Management, AASHTO
Sponsor: Booz Allen Hamilton
The US surface transportation finance system is broken. The combination of improving vehicle fuel economy (the CAFE standards call for 54 miles per gallon for new cars by 2025) and the reluctance of most state and federal politicians to increase the tax on motor fuel means that the traditional source of funding for transportation will continue to lag well behind demand. Mileage based user fees are often mentioned as the logical solution to this problem, although some observers believe that technology and privacy issues mean we are looking at a 20-25 year time horizon before this can happen. Others see opportunity with programs that begin with specific classes of vehicles: electric cars and hybrid vehicles or perhaps trucks. This session will highlight the latest thinking (including a summary of the fourth annual symposium on mileage based user fees – held in April 2012) and perhaps stimulate a debate between optimists and pessimists.